Translate this page into:
Maternal Deaths and Complications: Documentation of Parameters on the Partographs Used by Health Care Providers in Four Hospitals in West Cameroon

*Corresponding author: Armand Duclaire Kemo Djimeli, MD, MPHE, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, West Cameroon. Tel: +237 673569428. armanddjimeli39@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Djimeli AK, Kenfack B, Ateudjieu J. Maternal Deaths and Complications: Documentation of Parameters on the Partographs Used by Health Care Providers in Four Hospitals in West Cameroon. Int J Matern Child Health AIDS. 2025. 2025;14:e023. doi: 10.25259/IJMA_8_2025
Abstract
Background and Objective:
The majority of maternal deaths and complications attributable to obstructed and prolonged labor could be prevented through cost-effective and affordable health interventions such as the use of the partograph. The status of partograph documentation is poorly understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the quality of partograph documentation in four hospitals in the West Region of Cameroon.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted in four health facilities selected using a convenience sampling technique from June 1st to September 30th, 2024. A total of 495 partographs, corresponding to all partographs identified over a 6-month period from July to December 2023, were analyzed. Data were collected using an extraction grid in two regional hospitals (RHs) and two district hospitals (DHs). The collected data were entered into CSPro 7.3 and exported to R 4.3.3 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed.
Results:
The partograph utilization rate in this study was 62.6%. Parameters such as fetal heart rate, cervical dilation, and uterine contractions were accurately recorded in 80% or more of cases; however, the correct recording rate was <50% for modeling, amniotic fluid status, pulse, and temperature. Partograph documentation was better in RHs than in DHs.
Conclusion and Global Health Implications:
The status of partograph documentation was moderate. We recommended continuously supplying delivery rooms with partographs and organizing capacity-building sessions for healthcare providers on the correct use of the partograph.
Keywords
Cameroon
Documentation
Healthcare Providers
Partograph
West
INTRODUCTION
Globally, approximately 800 maternal deaths from preventable causes occurring during pregnancy or childbirth were recorded in 2020; nearly 95% of these deaths occurred in developing countries. The main affected regions are sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.[1]
The maternal mortality rate in Cameroon in 2020 was 438/100,000 live births,[2] highlighting the significant gap that needs to be closed to achieve a maternal death rate of <70/100,000 live births by 2030.[3] Obstructed labor is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality, with an estimated incidence of 8% of maternal deaths.[4] Obstetric complications and maternal deaths following obstructed labor could be prevented by inexpensive and effective practices such as the correct and systematic use of the partograph.[5] The partograph is a graphic record of labor progress and key maternal and fetal parameters over time.[6] It consists of four sections: identification of the woman, fetal monitoring parameters, labor progress parameters, and maternal parameters.[7]
Following a multicenter study conducted by the WHO, which demonstrated its effectiveness, the WHO strongly recommended its systematic use for monitoring parturients.[8] Studies have been conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Ghana, where it was found that newborns from births monitored using a partograph had a 4.29-fold lower risk of developing neonatal asphyxia.[9]
In Uganda, based on 355 partographs, it was found that approximately 61% of parameters were incompletely documented.[10] In Ethiopia, a study of 420 partographs found that parameters such as fetal heart rate, cervical dilation, and uterine contractions were correctly recorded in <40% of cases each.[11] In the North West of Cameroon, 58.2% of deliveries were monitored by partogram.[12] We note through the literature a low number of studies on the partogram in Cameroon in general and in the West in particular; thus, this study aimed to analyze the quality of the partograms completed in four hospitals in West Cameroon with a view to contributing to the achievement of sustainable development objectives.
METHODS
Study Design and Period
This was a cross-sectional study conducted between June 01st and September 30th, 2024.
Sampling and Study Sites
The study was conducted in four hospitals, including two hospitals of the 3rd category (Bafoussam Regional Hospital [RH] and Dschang Regional Annex Hospital), and two hospitals of 4rd category (Batcham District Hospital [DH] and Bamendjou DH), selected using a convenience sampling technique in the West Region, Cameroon.
Population
The study population consisted of all partographs used to monitor parturients from July to December 2023.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
This study included all partograms containing complete or partially complete information and excluded those for which no information was recorded.
Data Collection
A data extraction grid developed from the literature,[10-12] and pre-tested was used for data collection and included the recording of parameters related to parturient identification, fetal monitoring, labor progress, and maternal monitoring.
Standard protocols were defined based on the following time intervals: (1) Cervical dilation, descent of the presenting part, blood pressure, and thrusting monitored at least every 4 hours. (2) Fetal heart rate, uterine contractions, and the woman’s pulse are monitored every 30 min. (3) The baby’s condition after birth must always be recorded on the chart.[13] The parameters analyzed on the completed partographs were considered fully recorded if it was completely and correctly completed from the opening of the partograph until delivery; partially recorded if they contained recording errors or were not completely completed from the opening of the partograph until delivery; and finally, the parameter was qualified as not recorded when it contained no value from the beginning of labor until delivery.
Data Entry and Analysis
The extracted data were entered into CSPro version 7.3 software and then exported to R version 4.3.3 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the results were presented in tables.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee for Human Health Research of the West Region, Cameroon, before the study began. Furthermore, confidentiality was ensured during data collection through the anonymity of the extraction grids, which did not include the name of the woman in labor or the healthcare provider who performed the delivery; the collected data were securely stored.
RESULTS
A total of 495 partograph records were analyzed, the majority of which (41.6%, 206/495) came from Bafoussam RH, followed by 39.4% (195/495) from Dschang Regional Annex Hospital, followed by 12.3% (61/495) from Bamendjou DH, and finally 6.7% (33/495) from Batcham DH.
Prevalence of Partograph Use
Of the 1249 deliveries performed during the study, partographs were used in 782 of them, representing a prevalence of 62.6%.
Parturient Identification Parameters
The most commonly recorded parameters, including the patient’s name, pregnancy, and admission date, were recorded in 85% or more of cases in the four health facilities; followed by parity and admission time, where, unlike in other health facilities, these two parameters were recorded in a standard manner in less than two-thirds of 57.6% of partographs at Batcham Hospital. The time of membrane rupture was correctly recorded in 58.7% of cases at Bafoussam RH; this proportion was even lower, below 50%, in the other three health facilities [Table 1].
| Characteristic on the partograph | Bafoussam RH N1=206 | ARH Dschang N2=195 | Batcham DH N3=33 | Bamendjou DH N4=61 | Total N=495 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of patients | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 177 (85.9) | 181 (92.8) | 30 (90.9) | 61 (100.0) | 449 (90.7) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 29 (14.1) | 14 (7.2) | 3 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 46 (9.3) |
| Not monitored n(%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Gravidity | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 204 (99.0) | 193 (99.0) | 33 (100.0) | 59 (96.7) | 489 (98.8) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Not monitored n(%) | 2 (1.0) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.3) | 6 (1.2) |
| Parity | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 149 (72.3) | 152 (77.9) | 19 (57.6) | 49 (80.3) | 369 (74.5) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 54 (26.2) | 41 (21.0) | 14 (42.4) | 10 (16.4) | 119 (24.0) |
| Not monitored n(%) | 3 (1.5) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.3) | 7 (1.4) |
| Date of admission | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 205 (99.5) | 190 (97.4) | 30 (90.9) | 59 (96.7) | 484 (97.8) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.6) | 3 (0.6) |
| Not monitored n(%) | 1 (0.5) | 3 (1.5) | 3 (9.1) | 1 (1.6) | 8 (1.6) |
| Time of admission | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 184 (89.3) | 183 (93.8) | 19 (57.6) | 50 (82.0) | 436 (88.1) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 14 (6.8) | 8 (4.1) | 8 (24.2) | 8 (13.1) | 38 (7.7) |
| Not monitored n(%) | 8 (3.9) | 4 (2.1) | 6 (18.2) | 3 (4.9) | 21 (4.2) |
| Time membranes ruptured | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 121 (58.7) | 60 (30.8) | 12 (36.4) | 29 (47.5) | 222 (44.8) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 14 (6.8) | 80 (41.0) | 1 (3.0) | 4 (6.6) | 99 (20.0) |
| Not monitored n(%) | 71 (34.5) | 55 (28.2) | 20 (60.6) | 28 (45.9) | 174 (35.2) |
Bafoussam RH: Bafoussam Regional Hospital, ARH Dschang: Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Bamendjou DH: Bamendjou District Hospital, Batcham DH: Batcham District Hospital
Labor Progression Parameters
Regarding labor progression parameters, cervical dilation was optimally recorded in 85% or more of cases at the RHs, then decreased to 55.7% at Bamendjou Hospital and 36.4% at Batcham Hospital; a similar trend was observed for descent. In contrast, uterine contractions were correctly recorded in more than three-quarters of the partographs completed in all four health facilities [Table 2].
| Characteristic on the partograph | Bafoussam RH N1=206 | ARH Dschang N2=195 | Batcham DH N3=33 | Bamendjou DH N4=61 | Total N=495 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fetal monitoring | |||||
| Fetal heart rate | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 175 (85.0) | 168 (86.2) | 10 (30.3) | 47 (77.0) | 400 (80.8) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 25 (12.1) | 23 (11.8) | 19 (57.6) | 14 (23.0) | 81 (16.4) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 6 (2.9) | 4 (2.1) | 4 (12.1) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (2.8) |
| State of liquor | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 111 (53.9) | 110 (56.4) | 5 (15.2) | 11 (18.0) | 237 (47.9) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 49 (23.8) | 57 (29.2) | 5 (15.2) | 13 (21.3) | 124 (25.1) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 46 (22.3) | 28 (14.4) | 23 (69.7) | 37 (60.7) | 134 (27.1) |
| Moulding | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 54 (26.2) | 96 (49.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.6) | 151 (30.5) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 6 (2.9) | 43 (22.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.3) | 51 (10.3) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 146 (70.9) | 56 (28.7) | 33 (100.0) | 58 (95.1) | 293 (59.2) |
| Labor progress | |||||
| Cervical dilation | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 176 (85.4) | 186 (95.4) | 12 (36.4) | 34 (55.7) | 408 (82.4) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 30 (14.6) | 9 (4.6) | 20 (60.6) | 26 (42.6) | 85 (17.2) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.0) | 1 (1.6) | 2 (0.4) |
| Descent | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 177 (85.9) | 169 (86.7) | 11 (33.3) | 38 (62.3) | 395 (79.8) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 28 (13.6) | 24 (12.3) | 17 (51.5) | 17 (27.9) | 86 (17.4) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.0) | 5 (15.2) | 6 (9.8) | 14 (2.8) |
| Uterine contraction | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 183 (88.8) | 178 (91.3) | 27 (81.8) | 47 (77.0) | 435 (87.9) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 14 (6.8) | 11 (5.6) | 3 (9.1) | 14 (23.0) | 42 (8.5) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 9 (4.4) | 6 (3.1) | 3 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 18 (3.6) |
| Maternal monitoring | |||||
| Blood pressure | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 150 (72.8) | 137 (70.3) | 21 (63.6) | 40 (65.6) | 348 (70.3) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 54 (26.2) | 38 (19.5) | 10 (30.3) | 18 (29.5) | 120 (24.2) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 2 (1.0) | 20 (10.3) | 2 (6.1) | 3 (4.9) | 27 (5.5) |
| Pulse | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 56 (27.2) | 52 (26.7) | 5 (15.2) | 9 (14.8) | 122 (24.6) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 137 (66.5) | 110 (56.4) | 26 (78.8) | 43 (70.5) | 316 (63.8) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 13 (6.3) | 33 (16.9) | 2 (6.1) | 9 (14.8) | 57 (11.5) |
| Temperature | |||||
| Standard monitoring n(%) | 53 (25.7) | 65 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (19.7) | 130 (26.3) |
| Substandard monitoring n(%) | 43 (20.9) | 75 (38.5) | 4 (12.1) | 20 (32.8) | 142 (28.7) |
| Not monitoring n(%) | 110 (53.4) | 55 (28.2) | 29 (87.9) | 29 (47.5) | 223 (45.1) |
Bafoussam RH: Bafoussam Regional Hospital, ARH Dschang: Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Bamendjou DH: Bamendjou District Hospital, Batcham DH: Batcham District Hospital
Fetal Monitoring Parameters
Fetal heart rate was correctly recorded in 85% or more of cases in RHs; this proportion decreased to 77% at Bamendjou Hospital, and a proportion of <50%, or 30.3%, of correct recording was observed at Batcham Hospital. Furthermore, amniotic fluid color was recorded in a standard manner in more than 50% of cases in RHs; however, this proportion was <20% in DHs. Regarding modeling, it was correctly recorded in 49.2% of cases at the Dschang RH, RH. This proportion dropped to nearly a quarter at Bafoussam RH, and it was almost not recorded in 100% and 95.1% of completed partographs at the Batcham and Bamendjou DHs, respectively [Table 2].
Maternal Monitoring Parameters
Regarding maternal monitoring, the frequency of adequate blood pressure recording ranged from 63.6% at the Batcham ranged from 28.2% at the Dschang Hospital to 87.9% at the Batcham Hospital [Table 2].
Fetal Status after Delivery
Among the 495 completed partographs, the baby’s condition at birth, time of delivery, live birth, and newborn weight were recorded in 95% or more of cases; 78.8% of partographs reported spontaneous vaginal delivery [Table 3].
| Characteristic on the Partograph | Bafoussam RH N1=206 | ARH Dschang N2=195 | Batcham DH N3=33 | Bamendjou DH N4=61 | Total N=495 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recording condition of the baby after birth | |||||
| Yes n(%) | 200 (97.1) | 193 (99.0) | 29 (87.9) | 58 (95.1) | 480 (97.0) |
| No n(%) | 6 (2.9) | 2 (1.0) | 4 (12.1) | 3 (4.9) | 15 (3.0) |
| Time of delivery | |||||
| Recorded n(%) | 201 (97.6) | 193 (99.0) | 29 (87.9) | 57 (93.4) | 480 (97.0) |
| Not recorded n(%) | 5 (2.4) | 2 (1.0) | 4 (12.1) | 4 (6.6) | 15 (3.0) |
| Mode of delivery | |||||
| Spontaneous vaginal delivery n (%) | 175 (85.0) | 148 (75.9) | 26 (78.8) | 41 (67.2) | 390 (78.8) |
| Cesarian section n(%) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.6) | 4 (0.8) |
| Not recorded n(%) | 31 (15.0) | 44 (22.6) | 7 (21.2) | 19 (31.1) | 101 (20.4) |
| Fetal outcome | |||||
| Alive n(%) | 194 (94.2) | 193 (99.0) | 29 (87.9) | 58 (95.1) | 474 (95.8) |
| Dead n(%) | 7 (3.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (1.4) |
| Not recorded n(%) | 5 (2.4) | 2 (1.0) | 4 (12.1) | 3 (4.9) | 14 (2.8) |
| Sex of the new born | |||||
| Recorded n(%) | 201 (97.6) | 193 (99.0) | 29 (87.9) | 59 (96.7) | 482 (97.4) |
| Not recorded n(%) | 5 (2.4) | 2 (1.0) | 4 (12.1) | 2 (3.3) | 13 (2.6) |
| Weight of the new born | |||||
| Recorded n(%) | 202 (98.1) | 193 (99.0) | 28 (84.8) | 59 (96.7) | 482 (97.4) |
| Not recorded n(%) | 4 (1.9) | 2 (1.0) | 5 (15.2) | 2 (3.3) | 13 (2.6) |
Bafoussam RH: Bafoussam Regional Hospital, ARH Dschang: Annex Regional Hospital of Dschang, Batcham DH: Batcham District Hospital, Bamendjou DH: Bamendjou District Hospital
DISCUSSION
The prevalence of partograph use was 62.6%. Our result was higher than those reported by Nyiawung et al. 35%,[14] Verla et al. 34.8%[15] and Haile et al. 54.4%;[16] it was lower than that obtained by Ogwang et al. 69.9%[17] and Markos et al. 70.2%.[18] This average prevalence could be due to the unavailability of blank partographs, the lack of refresher training on the use of the partograph, as well as the absence or low number of midwives in certain health facilities.[15,18,19]
The identification parameters of parturients were relatively well reported in at least 85% of cases; however, the proportions of recording the time of rupture of membranes were low, which constitutes a shortcoming because this parameter will allow a better assessment of the maternal-fetal infection risk.
Cervical dilation was optimally recorded in 85% of cases and more in RHs, while it was <60% in DHs. In Northwest Cameroon, this proportion was 40.5%[12] and 43.9% in Uganda.[17] A similar trend was observed for descent, which is a significant gap because these parameters will help detect an abnormality in the progression of labor, for prompt decision-making. This could indicate limited knowledge and skills of health providers in DHs compared to RHs. Periodic refresher training is necessary, as well as strengthening human resources in health facilities to increase the quality of use of the partograph.
The fetal heart rate was correctly recorded in three out of four health facilities in a proportion of ≥77%, except for Batcham DH, where it was correct in 30.3%. This parameter is important in the assessment of fetal well-being; This proportion was 40.5% in the study carried out in North-West Cameroon[12] and 44.8% in Ethiopia.[20]
Lower levels of correct recording were observed for the coloration of amniotic fluid; while these parameters are of paramount importance in assessing fetal well-being, in fact, not noticing a possible variation, such as fetal bradycardia, amniotic fluid that has become meconium-stained can lead to missing diagnoses such as acute fetal distress. Regarding the monitoring of maternal parameters, the frequency of adequate recording of blood pressure was between 63.6% at the Batcham DH and 72.8% at the Bafoussam RH; the optimal recording was even lower for the pulse varying between 14.8% at the Bamendjou DH and 27.2% at the Bafoussam RH; this proportion was 12.3% in the Northwest of Cameroon[12] and 9.6% in Ethiopia.[20] These results show that although this parameter has been monitored, efforts still need to be made in monitoring blood pressure and pulse, because they allow the detection of the occurrence of preeclampsia or even possible externalized or non-externalized hemorrhage.
The total absence of temperature monitoring ranged from 28.2% at the Annex RH of Dschang to 87.9% at the Batcham DH. This is an important parameter, the elevation of which will allow us to detect or suspect the occurrence of malaria or any other infection. A retrospective design was used to assess the documentation of partographs completed during delivery, which is a limitation because the documentation may not reflect actual clinical practice. Ideally, the quality of partograph completion would have been assessed when the woman was seen and monitored in labor at the maternity ward. We can also note potential observer bias when extracting data from completed partographs. In addition, this study was conducted in 3rd and 4th category health facilities, it would be interesting to explore the documentation of partograms in 5th and 6th category health facilities; however, the weaknesses observed in the filling of the partogram in DHs (4th category), makes it possible to understand the possible gaps that could exist in 5th and 6th category health facilities concerning the use of the partogram.
CONCLUSION AND GLOBAL HEALTH IMPLICATIONS
The study showed that there is good partograph documentation in secondary health care facilities. However, it revealed that the partograph documentation in primary health care facilities mostly varies from poor to average based on parameters. It is recommended to support and provide periodic on-the-job training to health professionals on the documentation of the partograph and to conduct regular supportive supervision.
Key Messages
(1) The level of partograph use in this study was an average of 62.6%. Thus, the continuous availability of the partogram in labor wards and supervision is recommended for effective use of the partogram. (2) Concerning partograph forms recorded, 151 (30.5%) molding of fetal head, 237 (47.9%) state of liquor, 122 (24.6%) pulse, and 130 (26.3%) temperature were documented to the standard level at <50%. (3) The documentation of partograph was better in RHs than DHs; therefore, the capacity building and an increase number of midwives in the labor ward are recommended.
Acknowledgments:
None.
COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests; Financial Disclosure: Nothing to declare; Funding/Support: There was no funding for this study; Ethics Approval: Ethical approval for the study was sought and obtained from Regional Ethics Committee for Human Health Research in the West Region, Cameroon, number 1018/27/12/2023/CE/CRERSH-OU/VP, dated December 27, 2023. Declaration of Patient Consent: Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for Manuscript Preparation: The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI. Disclaimer: None.
References
- Maternal mortality. [Cited 2025 Apr 02]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
- [Google Scholar]
- Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: A systematic analysis by the UN maternal mortality estimation inter-agency group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462-74.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The World Bank and the United Nations population division. 2015. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; [Cited 2025 Feb 14]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org
- [Google Scholar]
- Trends in maternal mortality 1990 to 2010. 2012. Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and United Nations population division. Geneva: World Health Organization; [Cited 2025 Feb 02]. Available from: https://apps.who.int
- [Google Scholar]
- The partograph for the prevention of obstructed labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(2):256-69.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partograph utilization and factors associated with poor perinatal outcomes in Wolaita Sodo university referral hospital, Southern Ethiopia. J Health Med Nurs. 2019;63:34-44.
- [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. Lancet. 1994;343(8910):1399-404.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Use and completion of partograph during labour is associated with a reduced incidence of birth asphyxia: A retrospective study at a peri-urban setting in Ghana. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38:12.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Level of partograph completion and healthcare workers' perspectives on its use in Mulago national referral and teaching hospital, Kampala, Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):107.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Completion of the modified World Health Organization (WHO) partograph during labour in public health institutions of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Health J. 2013;10:23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Use of the partogram in the Bamenda health district, North-West region, Cameroon: A cross-sectional study. Gynecol Obstet Res Open J. 2016;2(5):102-11.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Partogram use in the Dar es Salaam perinatal care study. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr. 2008;100:37-40.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The partogram: Knowledge, attitude and use by healthcare providers at two hospitals in the South West Region of Cameroon. Arch Community Med Public Health. 2018;4:73-7.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Availability and utilization of pathogram by health care providers in labour wards of the Bamenda health district, Cameroon. SMU Med J. 2016;3:37-59.
- [Google Scholar]
- Partograph utilization And Associated Factors Among Obstetric Care Providers at Public Health Facilities in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. J Pregnancy. 2020;2020:3943498.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of partogram use during labour in Rujumbura Health Sub District, Rukungiri District, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 9:S27-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- Knowledge and utilization of partograph among health care professionals in public health institutions of Bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia. Public Health. 2016;137:162-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partograph utilization as a decision-making tool and associated factors among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2020;9:251.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Documentation status of the modified World Health Organization partograph in public health institutions of Bale zone, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):81.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
